Reviews
While one of the better parameters in evaluating, these reviews from colleagues, judges or clients introduces potential bias.
Legal professionals are not immune to popularity, superior & subordinate bias. Clients may lack knowledge/experience to adequately evaluate who is a qualified attorney. The more reviews the more likely you may get to objective ratings. While we may be biased, we believe our vast collection of information here is second to none. Being able to turn endless sets of information into something meaningful is where artificial intelligence becomes important. There are tens of millions of peer, client and judicial reviews on lawyers. Simply put, there are not enough people in any lawyer review agency who can evaluate all these reviews and individuals effectively, without artificial intelligence.
Read More
Results
Boasting “win” percentages, settlement amounts may no accurately reflect if an attorney got the most for his or her client.
Approximately 90% of cases end in settlement which may be considered a ‘win’. Settlement amounts, trial results, Nolle Prosequi (Charges/cases that are dropped) all help paint a clearer picture of a successful attorney. Again, gathering and processing all this data effectively is where a high technical skillset is required with artificial intellegence.
Read More
Contributions
Contributions to the legal community and society as a whole may seem to have little correlation to how effective an attorney is but studies suggest otherwise.
Staying proactive and continuing to learn are vital characteristics in a dynamic changing legal system.
Read More
Additional factors
We use several other factors as well. There may be an unlimited amount of additional factors to best rate an individual.
See our selection process to better understand the logistical process we use in selecting our candidates.
Read More